Children of Doom: Medical Malpractice and Malfeasance with COVID-19 Vaccines in Children

Updated: Jan 20

By: A. W. Finnegan

It is hardly surprising to see the pharmaceutical giants and the reckless public health systems using children like lab rats to test the still experimental COVID-19 vaccine in children as young as six months old and up.[1] Exposing these children to the very real possibility for adverse events still lacks any rationale since COVID-19 disease from the SARS-CoV-2 virus has negligible impact on their age group compared to the substantial risk and outright harm through the number of expectable adverse reactions that will be guaranteed to play out.[2] It is a tragedy currently playing out for children who otherwise have a long future ahead, and it is going to bring us no closer to the finish line. In the event of unexpected adverse reactions, an otherwise healthy child's life can be cut short by death or suffer a life plagued by suffering in the case of slow, debilitating chronic diseases having grave implications for the economy and their participation and quality of living life, and this had been briefly touched upon in earlier intelligence reports on the economic significance of a stealth virus that is worsened by medical countermeasures.[3]

Many children, at the current time and in the coming months and years ahead, will be knowingly killed and injured by the new COVID-19 vaccines and these numbers will vastly outperform the deaths caused by the virus itself in these age groups. Later in the article I will show there is already a plan in place for dealing with this ocean of vaccine injuries coming, Deny, Downplay, and Delegitimize, but feign compassion, of course.

Meanwhile, the older age groups have been facing considerable adverse reactions and deaths,[4] that are staggering when it becomes understood that what is being reported is merely 1% of the total, something inherent to passive monitoring systems where the vaccine recipient or their parental guardian is expected to report the injury through the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), the official reporting system run by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).[5] Websites for the victims of serious adverse events and death are already beginning to amass.[6] This author can also attest to significant feedback from personal testimony and immediate social circles indicating some very concerning health problems and injuries that occurred following the COVID-19 vaccine.[7] We can only expect many more will follow the rollout in children, and a very real likelihood that the rollout in children will bring even more side effects and deaths than adult populations are seeing.[8]

In fact, so far, we have scientific evidence of a higher likelihood that the younger age groups will endure the most injury in cardiac manifestations like myocarditis/pericarditis and thromboembolic events, so we can only expect that those even younger will have even higher chances of these injuries which can cause fatal outcomes and permanent injury, whereas infection with the wild-caught virus is not having nearly as high a burden as the vaccines would cause. Therefore, it is doing far more harm than good, and we have to ask ourselves why the public health system would consider such a brazen disregard for children and their future.[9]

To demonstrate the higher probability of injury to children with COVID-19 vaccines, we can look to other papers which demonstrate this. For example, one paper, Cardiovascular Complications of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines: An Overview, shows the link to blood clots and cardiac injury, noting its higher likelihood in younger recipients. It states:

...SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have been associated with rare, but sometimes fatal, cardiovascular side effects, which are the topics of this review. SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in general may cause thromboembolic events, such as cerebral vein thrombosis, and mRNA-based vaccines in particular may cause myocarditis/pericarditis, with the latter more likely to occur in younger adults after the second vaccination dose…[10]

SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccination-Associated Myocarditis in Children Ages 12-17: A Stratified National Database Analysis, shows the higher association to healthy teenage males and myocarditis/pericarditis:

SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccination-Associated Myocarditis in Children Ages 12-17: A Stratified National Database Analysis “For boys with no underlying health conditions, the chance of either CAE, or hospitalization for CAE, after their second dose of mRNA vaccination are considerably higher than their 120-day risk of COVID-19 hospitalization, even at times of peak disease prevalence.”[11]

Another paper published in November of 2021, COVID-19 Vaccination–Associated Myocarditis in Adolescents, shows the following:

63 patients (mean age: 15.6 years). 92% were male. All had received COVID Vaccines except for one, presented following the 2nd dose. - 4 had dysrhythmia - 14% had mild left ventricular dysfunction - 88% had myocarditis.[12]

A report from the summer of 2021 once again reveals the fact that preliminary biomarkers for abnormalities are present, especially when it comes to cardiac manifestations for the mRNA vaccine produced by Pfizer:

In this small case series study, myocarditis was diagnosed in children after COVID-19 vaccination, most commonly in boys after the second dose. In this case series, in short-term follow-up, patients were mildly affected. The long-term risks associated with postvaccination myocarditis remain unknown. Larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to inform recommendations for COVID-19 vaccination in this population. [13]

Another publication from November of 2021, Epidemiology of Acute Myocarditis/Pericarditis in Hong Kong Adolescents Following Comirnaty Vaccination, clearly demonstrates the risk of cardiac injury:

"There is a significant increase in the risk of myocarditis/pericarditis following Comirnaty vaccination among male adolescents, especially after the second dose." [14]

If cardiac manifestations by Pfizer's mRNA vaccine were extremely rare, it would not be considered a significant risk, they would say it is negligible, but a significant risk is a risk that has considerable impact. Personal testimony from friends of this author who have been to the hospitals in recent months relayed to me high numbers of teens who were at the emergency room being treated for myocarditis following a COVID-19 vaccination, which would lend some corroborating evidence.

There seems to be little uproar about the vaccine rollout in children, likely because most don't even realize that adult populations are facing very high numbers of death and adverse events. Another major contribution to this problem is the underlying intimidation factors associated with the political climate surrounding vaccines and the corporate political motivations of the pharmaceutical industry and the public health system itself.

A search of recent science publications on PubMed for "COVID-19 vaccine in children" brings back many hits, but the vast majority seem to be far less concerned for the potential adverse effects and issues of safety giving new COVID-19 vaccines to children as young as six months old.[15] Instead of significant concern for safety, there is stark enthusiasm and an excessive drive for only one thing; a political agenda called fighting vaccine hesitancy and making the parents accept these new experimental inoculations in their children.[16], [17] The justifications for these shots in children will often cite the need to reach herd immunity or the post-infectious long-COVID syndrome as the necessity for vaccination, but fail to point out that the inoculations themselves can also trigger the condition, as the spike protein's effect on the immune system is what generates the post-infection and post-vaccinal syndrome to begin with.[18]

Long-COVID is merely just a reinvented term for immune tolerance and the subsequent slow-virus disease resulting from chronic immunosuppression as a post-sepsis syndrome. [19] It was also seen with many other infectious diseases and vaccine adverse events, and it is a condition of immunosuppression which reactivates latent viruses like the neurotropic herpesviruses like Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) among others, which then begin attacking the body and causing chronic fatigue with other systemic chronic health and mental health problems.[20] The public health system has no intention of dealing with these conditions and has been denying and slandering those affected for decades.[21]

The public health system and their pharmaceutical partners have no problem admitting the existence of such conditions if they can find ways to exploit it for further justification for vaccinations, though they forgot to mention that vaccination is also one of the causes of its activation, as both post-infection syndromes and post-vaccinal syndromes are merely both one and the same condition,[22] a post-sepsis syndrome that plagues the individual with chronic health problems from the permanent damage to the immune system and biological makeup of the individual affected.[23], [24], [25]

This political agenda obsessed with forcing parents to accept and submit their children to vaccination is pinning the Government and their corporate partners against the people in a horrifying way. Pfizer has no problem skewing trial data to pass their vaccine off as safe and effective in groups of trial participants that do not reflect the real-world population.[26]

Most people in America have at least one or two known underlying health problems. Many more have yet undiagnosed underlying health problems.[27] Emergency Rooms are currently overflowing with many patients who don’t have COVID-19 but instead all of the same symptoms being reported through VAERS, especially blood clots, cardiac problems, new mental health problems, and so on.[28] These are all the usual suspects of symptoms these spike proteins are able to cause when they wreak havoc on the body. These spike proteins are devious poisons that can act in subtle but profound ways, some causing immediate effects, while others taking long periods of time to emerge, affecting both physical and mental health simultaneously.[29]

Add this to the fact that the passive reporting systems are incompetent, running months if not years behind.[30] That means very real harm playing out in a post-market public setting will not be assessed for many months to years from now, but that doesn’t stop them from forcing people to take substantial risks and add significant burdens to their physical health and well-being, even being fired from their jobs for not doing so.[31]

The data given to the FDA by the drug companies to secure their Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) was extremely flawed, if not categorically fraud, as it was clearly manipulated to secure their EUA and subsequent contracts through selective and clever manipulation of several factors to make it to the finish line.[32] Many of these factors will be laid out in a separate article, but can be found in a recent publication Why Are We Vaccinating Children Against COVID-19? We can only expect that similar levels of clever manipulation will take place to secure the same EUA in children. A brief summary of the paper just mentioned demonstrates the need for ethical reevaluation in the following abstract:

This article examines issues related to COVID-19 inoculations for children. The bulk of the official COVID-19-attributed deaths per capita occur in the elderly with high comorbidities, and the COVID-19 attributed deaths per capita are negligible in children. The bulk of the normalized post-inoculation deaths also occur in the elderly with high comorbidities, while the normalized post-inoculation deaths are small, but not negligible, in children. Clinical trials for these inoculations were very short-term (a few months), had samples not representative of the total population, and for adolescents/children, had poor predictive power because of their small size. Further, the clinical trials did not address changes in biomarkers that could serve as early warning indicators of elevated predisposition to serious diseases. Most importantly, the clinical trials did not address long-term effects that, if serious, would be borne by children/adolescents for potentially decades.

A novel best-case scenario cost-benefit analysis showed very conservatively that there are five times the number of deaths attributable to each inoculation vs those attributable to COVID-19 in the most vulnerable 65+ demographic. The risk of death from COVID-19 decreases drastically as age decreases, and the longer-term effects of the inoculations on lower age groups will increase their risk-benefit ratio, perhaps substantially.[33]

Further in the article, the authors demonstrate the highly toxic properties and potential of the spike protein which the mRNA vaccines are training our body's own cells to secrete, that is, the antigenic or spike protein found on SARS-CoV-2 virus: Intrinsic inoculant toxicity

Children are unique relative to COVID-19. They have negligible risks of serious effects from the disease, as shown in Fig. 1. Given that the COVID-19 inoculants were only tested for a few months, and mid-or long-term adverse effects are unknown, any mid- or long-term adverse events that emerge could impact children adversely for decades.

We believe that mid-or long-term adverse effects are possible based on the recent emergence of evidence that would support the probability of mid-and long-term adverse effects from the COVID-19 inoculants, such as:

· 1) The spike protein itself can be a toxin/pathogenic protein:

· 2) S protein alone can damage vascular endothelial cells (ECs) by downregulating ACE2 and consequently inhibiting mitochondrial function [[34]].

· 3) it is concluded that ACE2 and endothelial damage is a central part of SARS-CoV2 pathology and may be induced by the spike protein alone [[35]].

· 4) the spike protein of SARS-CoV-1 (without the rest of the virus) reduces ACE2 expression, increases angiotensin II levels, exacerbates lung injury, and triggers cell signaling events that may promote pulmonary vascular remodeling and Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) as well as possibly other cardiovascular complications [[36]].

· 5) the recombinant S protein alone elicits functional alterations in cardiac vascular pericytes (PCs) [[37]]. This was documented as:

· 6) increased migration

· 7) reduced ability to support EC network formation on Matrigel

· 8) secretion of pro-inflammatory molecules typically involved in the cytokine storm

· 9) production of pro-apoptotic factors responsible for EC death. Furthermore, the S protein stimulates the phosphorylation/activation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) through the CD147 receptor, but not ACE2, in cardiac PCs, the S protein may elicit vascular cell dysfunction, potentially amplifying, or perpetuating, the damage caused by the whole coronavirus [[38]].

· 10) “even in the absence of the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptors, the S1 subunit from SARS-CoV-2 spike protein binding to neutral phospholipid membranes leads to their mechanical destabilization and permeabilization. A similar cytotoxic effect of the protein was seen in human lung epithelial cells.” [[39]].

· 11) The LNP layer encapsulating the mRNA of the inoculant is highly inflammatory in both intradermal and intranasal inoculation [[40]] and “Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is a cause of anaphylaxis to the Pfizer/BioNTech mRNA COVID-19 vaccine” [[41]]. “Humans are likely developing PEG antibodies because of exposure to everyday products containing PEG. Therefore, some of the immediate allergic responses observed with the first shot of mRNA-LNP vaccines might be related to pre-existing PEG antibodies. Since these vaccines often require a booster shot, anti-PEG antibody formation is expected after the first shot. Thus, the allergic events are likely to increase upon re-vaccination” [[42]].

There is also the possibility that the components of the LNP shell could induce the ASIA Syndrome (autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants), as shown by studies on post-inoculation thyroid hyperactivity [[43]] and post-inoculation subacute thyroiditis [[44]].

· 12) The spike protein has been found in the plasma of post-inoculation individuals, implying that it could circulate to, and impact adversely, any part of the body [[45]].

· 13) The spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 crosses the blood-brain barrier in mice [[46]], and “the SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins trigger a pro-inflammatory response on brain endothelial cells that may contribute to an altered state of BBB function” [[47]].

· 14) The spike proteins manufactured in vivo by the present COVID-19 inoculations could potentially "precipitate the onset of autoimmunity in susceptible subgroups, and potentially exacerbate autoimmunity in subjects that have pre-existing autoimmune diseases", based on the finding that anti-SARS-CoV-2 protein antibodies cross-reacted with 28 of 55 diverse human tissue antigens [[48]].

· 15) “The biodistribution of ChaAdOx1 [Astra Zeneca’s recombinant adenovirus vaccine candidate against SARS-CoV-2] in mice confirmed the delivery of vaccine into the brain tissues [[49]]. The vaccine may therefore spur the brain cells to produce CoViD spike proteins that may lead to an immune response against brain cells, or it may spark a spike protein-induced thrombosis. This may explain the peculiar incidences of the fatal cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) observed with viral vector-based CoViD-19 vaccines” [[50],[51]].

A complementary perspective to explain adenovirus-based vaccine-induced thrombocytopenia is that “transcription of wildtype and codon-optimized Spike open reading frames enables alternative splice events that lead to C-terminal truncated, soluble Spike protein variants. These soluble Spike variants may initiate severe side effects when binding to ACE2-expressing endothelial cells in blood vessels.” [[52]].

· 16) A Pfizer Confidential study performed in Japan showed that "modRNA encoding luciferase formulated in LNP comparable to BNT162b2″ injected intramuscularly concentrated in many organs/tissues in addition to the injection site [[53]]. The main organs/sites identified were adrenal glands, liver, spleen, bone marrow, and ovaries. While damage to any of these organs/sites could be serious (if real for humans), adverse effects on the ovaries could be potentially catastrophic for women of childbearing or pre-childbearing age.

The main objective of credible biodistribution studies (of inoculants for eventual human use) is to identify the spatio-temporal distribution of the actual inoculant in humans; i.e., how much of the final desired product (in this case, expressed protein antigen/spike protein) is produced in different human tissues and organs as a function of time. That’s not what was reported in the Pfizer Confidential study .[54]

Operation Warp Speed spent $18 billion dollars to fast-track a process that was meant to take nearly a decade or more.[55] The conventional process was long for a reason, and this was because vaccines come with all sorts of unexpected problems that can often unravel slowly over time, many mid- to long-term adverse effects are very real and serious.[56] Even then, many adverse reactions of a subclinical and subacute nature are able to evade the lengthy safety process in vaccine development and go ignored in the post-market surveillance.[57]

At any rate, mid- to long-term risks of vaccine complications have very real potential and with a toxic spike protein of this nature there is high potential and probability.[58] Many would be more likely to cause slow, debilitating chronic diseases, while some could be entirely fatal.[59] Fatal prion diseases, for example, have long incubation periods of several years or more to reach the acute phase and is invariably 100% fatal in all instances.[60] There are already potentialities for these spike proteins to initiate the activation of prion disease.[61] Would they notify us of any possible risk of prion disease in that short time frame, or would we just begin seeing its effects in societies through clusters of cases like those now reported in Canadians? [62]

They are far less concerned about any hazards resulting from vaccination. In fact, they never even checked for any abnormal biomarkers that would have been able to tell us if there were preclinical abnormalities in the body that could have predicted this, they could have checked for these in the clinical trials, but they chose not to.[63] This author has already been informed of one case of a fatal prion disease following a COVID-19 vaccine and was told they had clear evidence it was related to the vaccine but wouldn’t commit it to paper because of the political climate. This is the dangerous precedent being set by a multi-billion-dollar campaign by the State Department for fighting vaccine hesitancy.[64]

The Trump administration and the State Department did not want to consider these factors in Operation Warp Speed, such as but not limited to how developing these vaccines in such an exceedingly short time bypassed many safeguards that were meant to consider safety more thoroughly, but even then, harmful vaccines have still been reaching the market for decades, so these will be a lot worse. They ran these vaccines through with skewed trial data to appear safe but what is occurring in the real world contradicts the safety profile touted by the trial data.[65]

The former president is now touting the vaccine was a historic victory under his administration, claiming he saved millions of lives,[66] even though the vaccine did not stop the virus whatsoever, the virus has been surging like never before in highly vaccinated countries and regions of the United States, and all the unwanted side effects reported to VAERS are being totally ignored.[67] What about all the unacknowledged deaths that have been reported to VAERS that merely changed the cause of death from COVID-19 to complications like blood clots, strokes, heart attacks, brain aneurysms, and so on? COVID-19 cases are now being recorded in even higher numbers,[68] and the public health officials are now hinting at indefinite booster shots for the foreseeable future:

…That’s why many experts believe the COVID vaccines will end up being annual or even semi-annual jabs. You’ll need a fourth jab, a fifth jab, a sixth jab, et cetera, forever.[69]

Meanwhile, other articles indicate that the so-called immunity from the booster shots only lasts a mere 2 months:

“Within a month or two, the protection in Israel could be almost back to where it was before vaccines,” a report by the knowledge center warned. “The transition from Delta to Omicron will make Israel go from being reasonably protected to being almost not protected at all.” [70]

Recently, Pfizer and their partners at BioNTech SE have delayed plans to seek authorization of the COVID-19 vaccine in children citing suboptimal immune responses.[71] That would be expected in children who are more heavily burdened immunologically than the adult populations. Just as they saw with transplant recipients, who are also immunosuppressed, the immune response was weak to none at all.[72] They did not however, halt their plans to delay the vaccine rollout in children and they are still saying it plans to be released in 2022. Will think tanks meet and configure how to skew data in more clever ways to overcome each hurdle like they did with the initial trial data in adults? The only thing historic about this vaccine is the brazen disregard for safety and its post-market assessment.[73], [74], [75]

Pre-rehearsed Plan for the Coming Vaccine Injury: Deny, Downplay, Delegitimize, but Feign Compassion

When the vaccine adverse reactions begin to surface, there is already a plan in place having been rehearsed ahead of schedule through theoretical framework in a fictional account of a pandemic caused by a novel coronavirus that takes place in 2025-2028 called The SPARS Pandemic 2025 - 2028: A Futuristic Scenario for Public Health Risk Communicators, written in 2017, for the purpose of "rehearsal":

The following narrative comprises a futuristic scenario that illustrates communication dilemmas concerning medical countermeasures (MCMs) that could plausibly emerge in the not-so-distant future. Its purpose is to prompt users, both individually and in discussion with others, to imagine the dynamic and oftentimes conflicted circumstances in which communication around emergency MCM development, distribution, and uptake takes place. While engaged with a rigorous simulated health emergency, scenario readers have the opportunity to mentally “rehearse” responses while also weighing the implications of their actions. At the same time, readers have a chance to consider what potential measures implemented in today’s environment might avert comparable communication dilemmas or classes of dilemmas in the future.[76]

Later in the report, there is a chapter called Vaccine Injury, where the aftermath of the pandemic is considered and an ocean of vaccine injuries in children is expected. The response they have rehearsed in this section is to deny, downplay, and coverup the extensive neurological damage, disease, and permanent injury caused by the vaccine, without the victims being compensated and expected to carry the burden themselves along with the families affected.

…not all changes in opinion were in favor of public health messaging. As time passed and more people across the United States were vaccinated, claims of adverse side effects began to emerge. Several parents claimed that their children were experiencing neurological symptoms similar to those seen among livestock exposed to the GMI vaccine. By May 2027, parental anxiety around this claim had intensified to the point of lawsuits. That month, a group of parents whose children developed mental retardation as a result of encephalitis in the wake of Corovax vaccination sued the federal government, demanding removal of the liability shield protecting the pharmaceutical companies responsible for developing and manufacturing Corovax.

The growing plaintiff cohort quickly withdrew their suit upon learning that the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Trust Fund (NVICTF) and an emergency appropriation of funds authorized by Congress under the PREP Act existed to provide financial reimbursement to those who were adversely affected by the Corovax vaccine in order to cover healthcare costs and other related expenses.2,3 Given the positive reaction to the federal government’s response and the fact that the majority of US citizens willing to be vaccinated had already been immunized, the negative publicity surrounding adverse reactions had little effect on nationwide vaccination rates. The focus on adverse side effects, however, resulted in a considerable increase in the number of compensation claims filed, and many grew concerned about the long-term effects that Corovax could have on their health. This concern was particularly high among some African American parents who continued to question the government’s motives regarding the Corovax vaccination campaign.

While the FDA, CDC, and other agencies were busy researching possible connections between Corovax and the reported neurological side effects, their efforts were continually undermined by epidemiological analyses produced by various non-governmental individuals and groups. A popular science blogger EpiGirl, for example, began posting interactive maps of the incidence of Corovax side effects in April 2027. To create the maps, EpiGirl collected anecdotes of adverse Corovax side effects using Facebook, Twitter and YouTube and combined them with data downloaded from the HHS Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a national vaccine safety surveillance program maintained by the CDC and FDA. EpiGirl also encouraged those among her subscribers who were Apple product users to share health data with her via Apple’s Research Kit and HealthKit applications. EpiGirl’s maps were consequently shared widely in social media circles and even included in local and national news reports.

The federal government became concerned about the validity of EpiGirl’s anecdotal data and the widespread sharing of patient information via the internet. EpiGirl’s data showed a significantly higher incidence rate of nearly every reported side effect; however, federal officials believed that this was largely due to duplicate entries resulting from compiling data from multiple sources. Additionally, EpiGirl’s data did not seek to address the cause of the reported side effects, only the incidence rate. Publication of similar results from organizations such as Patients-Like-Me, a group closely associated with the natural medicine movement, further legitimized these independent reports. The government attempted to respond to these claims through formal press releases, but these were neither as visually appealing nor as interactive as EpiGirl’s maps and were, therefore, largely ignored.

While the federal government appeared to have appropriately addressed concerns around the acute side effects of Corovax, the long-term, chronic effects of the vaccine were still largely unknown. Nearing the end of 2027, reports of new neurological symptoms began to emerge. After showing no adverse side effects for nearly a year, several vaccine recipients slowly began to experience symptoms such as blurry vision, headaches, and numbness in their extremities. Due to the small number of these cases, the significance of their association with Corovax was never determined. As of this writing in 2030, longitudinal studies initiated by the NIH at the beginning of the vaccination program have not reached the next round of data collection, so formal analysis on these symptoms has not yet been conducted. Furthermore, these cases arose from the initial cohort of vaccine recipients—those in high- risk populations, including those with other underlying health conditions—making it increasingly difficult to determine the extent to which these symptoms are associated with vaccination.

As these cases emerged, patients began filing for compensation under the PREP Act. Due to lingering uncertainties over possible links between vaccination and reported neurological symptoms, their compensation requests were placed on indefinite hold, pending further data analysis. This cohort, many of whom adamantly supported the Corovax vaccine initially, quickly took to social media to publicize their issues.

Despite relatively few reports of neurological symptoms, the social media response was immense. After experiencing initial success with PREP Act compensation policies and working diligently to ensure transparency throughout the claim request and evaluation process, HHS was caught off guard by the new round of negative publicity. They were pressured by the public and media to award compensation to those claiming long-term effects from Corovax despite having no data to support these claims. Displaying a fundamental misunderstanding of scientific research, many demanded proof that the vaccines did not cause long-term effects. HHS Secretary Nagel firmly and vocally supported the decision to postpone evaluation of all claims of long-term side effects and invited an independent Congressional investigation to ensure that the PREP Act was being properly implemented.

In addition to demands for immediate compensation, Congress faced public pressure to increase the PREP Act emergency appropriation. While the initial allocation of funds was sufficient to provide compensation for acute side effects, the prospect of long-term effects and potentially permanent disability gave rise to concerns that additional resources would be necessary in the near future.[77]

A follow-up chapter, Acknowledging Loss, designed to teach public health officials to feign compassion and sympathy to victims of vaccine injury despite the tremendous burden of proof they are expected to provide using incompetent diagnostic standards to prove it, rehearses once again how to deny, downplay, and coverup the mess made by the vaccine, pinning it on the injured as a sacrifice they are expected to make for their communities and the government:

At the request of HHS Secretary Nagel, ASPR convened a series of meetings among senior leadership of the federal health agencies to address policy and program changes being implemented as a result of a departmental review of the response to the SPARS pandemic. Among the issues considered were the implications of growing negative public opinion regarding Corovax and the government’s perceived indifference to victims of the public health response to SPARS. One senior health official argued that time and a robust medical monitoring program for vaccine recipients—the components of which were already in place—should be sufficient to determine whether public concern about long-term effects was, in fact, warranted: “We have to wait for the data. People need to understand that fact.”

One prominent attendee at these meetings was Dr. Ann Flynn, the director of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Staff from the administration’s Disaster Technical Assistance Center had recently briefed Dr. Flynn on usage data for the SAMHSA Disaster Distress Helpline over the past year, and summary reports indicated that a significant number of helpline users said that their principal worry was associated with the SPARS pandemic and, more recently, uncertainty about potential long-term effects of Corovax. Considering this new knowledge, Dr. Flynn countered the earlier claim that the public simply needed to wait until the science was clear: “Communities around the country went through what some felt was a harrowing public health emergency, only later to confront the possibility, however slim, that the medicine we promised would help them may in fact be hurting them.”

The senior leaders in attendance concluded, after much prompting by Dr. Flynn, that no top political or public health figurehead had publicly recognized the collective sense of vulnerability that the pandemic had elicited or the strength that the public exhibited under threat of grave danger. Moreover, no national leader had publicly acknowledged the public’s broad willingness to accept a prescribed countermeasure that promised to end the pandemic, but whose long-term consequences were not fully understood at the time.

Following the meeting, ASPR recommended to HHS Secretary Nagel that SAMHSA collaborate with stakeholders and devise behavioral health guidance for the states, tribes, and territories on how to strengthen the public’s coping skills, provide support for grieving individuals, encourage a forward direction, and meet other SPARS recovery needs. It was further recommended that Secretary Nagel consult with President Archer about the possibility of acknowledging the emotional toll of SPARS during a future public appearance. The primary message would be one of gratitude to the American people for remaining strong during the pandemic. Another key message would convey appreciation for adhering to public health recommendations, including vaccination, to hasten the end of the pandemic in the face of considerable uncertainty.

President Archer agreed to address the country’s resolve and recovery in the face of SPARS. Top risk communication advisors from the CDC, FDA, NIH, and SAMHSA conferred as a group about how best to frame the President’s remarks. The group vigorously debated whether it was appropriate for the President to acknowledge the sacrifice that vaccine recipients had made on behalf of their communities or to console them in their grief over that sacrifice.[78]

This is the plan for the coming years ahead, and since they wrote it several years prior to the declared pandemic, they can't really say they were caught unprepared with these possible factors, because they foresaw it and rehearsed for it ahead of schedule. This has been how they deal with all the other vaccine injuries that have been occurring for decades. They plan to treat this vaccine exactly the same, they have no concern or compassion for the vaccine injured, its why they had to remind those rehearsing it about why one should pretend to be compassionate while trying to tell them to "move on already" with their damaged children and overwhelming burden, as it is painted as everyone's duty to be blindly obedient to the public health system and government:


Bringing a Sense of Resolution to a Period of Crisis While Striking a Balance Between the Need to Affirm Collective Grief and Loss and the Need to Move Forward


I) Given the uncertain long-term safely profile of the Corovax vaccine, why are both science and sympathy necessary when communicating about a possible correlation between vaccination and adverse events?

2) What general communication principles does the advice of Dr. Ann Flynn suggest with respect to the recovery phase of a public health emergency involving MCMs? What might pre-event planning for recovery-phase communication look like based on her guidance?[79]

Conclusion: More Fuel to an Already Raging Neurotropic Fire

COVID-19's effect in children is negligible and should not warrant more vaccines stacked on top of what they already receive, which is already excessive and causing a considerable rise in permanent injuries and damaging their ability to have a quality life in which they can function properly and grow normally.[80] This will be ignored and left out of the discussion just as they have done for decades with autism and other developmental disorders resulting from increasingly overwhelming the immune system and brain at an early age with vaccinations.[81]

The autism connection to vaccines is not disinformation, but the connection to aluminum is unlikely, though it can be toxic. In another article, I will discuss this entire issue and why even if Andrew Wakefield's studies were not done properly, or manipulated to some extent, it still does not mean that the vaccine can't be linked to autism, he and the co-authors just didn't do it properly.[82]

As for the connection to vaccination, Autism occurs following certain immunological and para-infectious processes are the culprit which are also reflected in some of the acute neurological diseases that can occur from the same mechanics.[83] Vaccination is not the only cause that can activate the condition, as some viral infections can bring it on, but considering that most of the infantile population is challenged with significant burden from numerous vaccines including some live virus vaccines, it is most often the triggering mechanism that initiates the process for autism to be brought on, and in the case of the onset of autism following a vaccine, the culprit is self-evident.[84] The connection to several polyoma viruses in the polio vaccines is also a likely culprit involved, as they are all neurotropic, and once again, links directly to earlier vaccines.[85]

Children born today have an increased burden to their immune systems and the odds are increasingly being stacked against them, as neuro-developmental disorders are skyrocketing to unseen proportions, and many are plagued by a myriad of health problems.[86] Much of this can be attributed to para-infectious processes affecting the central nervous system like vaccine viruses and the neurotropic effect of antigen,[87] as well as viruses transmitted through generations congenitally in the same manner as the virus of Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis (LCM) that was discovered and studied by German virologist Erich Traub in 1936. [88]

As more immunological burden is placed upon them with further vaccinations, the higher the chances of dangerous reactions that leave permanent neurological damage to occur. Often this is the result of immunosuppression and the subsequent reactivation of latent viruses of the herpesvirus family,[89] along with vaccine viruses that revert to active form, which are many times neurotropic.[90] As several measurable acute neurological disorders have been known to occur following vaccination, a whole spectrum of less definable neurological disease can occur which often goes undetected and undiagnosed until classed as a psychiatric disease with no defined cause.[91]

Autism, like Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS), and Subacute Sclerosing Panencephalitis (SSPE) are diseases that are identical to the earlier reports of post-vaccinal adverse events and polio-like diseases of the central nervous system that presented with neurological disease and psychiatric abnormalities that were highly variable in their presentations. GBS is also variable and has six subtypes within itself. Both GBS and autistic-like mental defects were described in earlier publications on post-vaccinal injuries that followed with neurological disease and psychiatric abnormalities. The outcome and presentations were always highly variable but mental defects resembling autism were clearly described in earlier reports of post-vaccinal encephalitis.[92]

The variation is explainable by a general, non-specific neurotropic effect of antigen accumulating in the epithelium of vascular and nerve tissue, along with the immune response, which then damage and inhibit brain functionality and proper development.[93] The class of antigen called fusion proteins are the culprit, as the antigenic stimuli in the vascular and nerve tissue accumulates antigen through cell fusion with the host tissue and propagates itself in the tissues affected, while deteriorating the tissue in the process, while the immune response forms antigen-antibody complexes that continue to circulate the affected areas, as well as antigenic material being left on the tissue itself causing the immune system to attack the host tissue with antigenic material fused with its own.[94]

The new COVID-19 vaccines will add an ever-increasing burden on the already overwhelmed infant and youth of the population. The spike protein is immunosuppressive,[95] along with the Polyethylene Glycol (PEG).[96] Giving these vaccinations at an early age can suppress the immune system, and following these with routine vaccines which employ live viruses such as MMR, it will be a dangerous combination and will foster the conditions for reactivation of the vaccine viruses and these have fatal potential in such cases. As I've cited many times before, cases of fatal injury from the MMR vaccine can occur in infants who are immunosuppressed or immunologically overburdened. The paper Altered Virulence of Vaccine Strains of Measles After Prolonged Replication in Human Tissue states:

However, fatal infections have been documented in immunodeficient children vaccinated with these strains (1, 12, 14, 15). The symptoms of infection occur many months after immunization, and the viruses isolated are similar to the original LA vaccine (1, 15), suggesting that in the absence of an effective host immune response, persistent infection with the vaccine strain can lead to fatal disease. Viruses isolated from these children could potentially represent virulent revertants of the original LA vaccine.[97]

Implementing these mRNA vaccines in children is a dangerous recipe, setting them up for a grim future of hardship and suffering, which should have otherwise been healthy and with some level of quality in life. These new vaccines are unjustified in children, and it can be seen as nothing more than overreaching powers of authority by pharmaceutical giants and their public health system of enforcers.[98] It is predictable that if they are able to pass off these vaccines as safe & effective in the trials, they will attempt to mandate the vaccine for children.[99] There is already talk of mandating COVID-19 vaccines in children in many of the publications just published through PubMed.[100]

Rolling out COVID-19 vaccines in children is not only unjustified, it is also resulting in deaths that far exceed the number of deaths from COVID-19 by several orders of magnitude. This is completely unacceptable and those responsible should be shown for what they are, murderers and criminals. This is a horrifying reality now playing out and most of the population has no clue what is even taking place, that mass murder is being allowed and somehow rationalized under this vaccine rollout and they are able to get away with it because people are by and large ignorant and given a misleading presentation of data. When the death toll of an age group in which prophylactic inoculations are given to prevent a said disease causes far more death than the act of nature and when this is knowingly done, it can only be interpreted one way - mass murder. Most of the population not well-versed in these arenas aren’t aware of the ways these pharmaceutical firms are able to skew and manipulate data to get their products to the finish line at the expense of civilians and children.[101]

Children should be able to have a shot at a long and prosperous future, and many are being cut short and plagued by the strain that these spike proteins are able to produce in the body, which is more often than not long and debilitating.[102] This will come with disastrous effects on the economy, on the mental health of future generations, on the stability of the society itself.[103] We all have an obligation to start paying attention to what is taking place and shed as much light on these matters as possible. The children are not lab rats and are not able to comprehend what is taking place, they aren’t able to make informed choices and calculate the very apparent risks that could affect their entire future, and there are considerable risks of death, of permanent injury, of neurotropic effects causing neurologic sequelae, cardiac injury, and so much more. These spike proteins can deviate the body in and typically does so in infinite variation, but one wouldn’t know that based on the data from the clinical trials, and the public health system deceives vaccine recipients because fighting vaccine hesitancy is more important than safety,[104] and the livelihood of our children and future generations are at the receiving end of these lies, as innocent victims of these crimes against humanity.[105]

[1] Pfizer. (n.d.). Guide to clinical trials for children. Pfizer. Retrieved January 5, 2022, from [2] Kostoff, Ronald N et al. “Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19?.” Toxicology reports vol. 8 (2021): 1665-1684. doi:10.1016/j.toxrep.2021.08.010 [3] Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Office of Transnational Issues (OTI), ”The Darker Bioweapons Future,” (Unclassified Intelligence Report). Directorate of Intelligence, Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). 3 December 2003. Retrieved from: [4] OpenVAERS. (n.d.). VAERS COVID Vaccine Adverse Event Reports. OpenVAERS. Retrieved January 9, 2022, from [5] Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2011, January). Understanding the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Retrieved January 9, 2022, from:,%20blood%20&%20biologics/published/Understanding-the-Vaccine-Adverse-Event-Reporting-System-(VAERS).pdf [6] For Example: No More Silence. (2022, January 5). Homepage of No More Silence - Telling Our Stories. No More Silence - Telling Our Stories. Retrieved January 9, 2022, from [7] As I have been involved in Vaccine Safety activism for some years, I have come to meet and know many of those injured permanently or extensively by vaccines they were told were safe, but I have also learned of many more from other walks of life not involved in vaccine safety activism. This year, during the rollout of COVID-19 vaccination I have heard of more injuries from my extended social circles than any other previous year combined. Having been involved in the activism meant learning the science, and I gained a superb understanding of these forms of disease from the study of Erich Traub's immune tolerance and the slow-virus disease. These are essentially the pillars of most chronic diseases, and they are often marked by chronic immunosuppression, virus reactivation, and autoimmunity. Writing a lengthy book on the history of incapacitating biological agents and biological warfare meant getting far more insight on these and other angles relevant to these matters. That is to say, vaccines were often causing the same incapacitating chronic diseases as many of the biological weapons themselves. They both caused the exact same condition, a post-sepsis syndrome marked by a disabled immune system. I have seen all the hallmark symptoms in so many of the adverse reactions I have been hearing about from friends and their families and extended friends. Public Health is running at least a year to several years behind in assessing the safety of this vaccine that was put on the market under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). [8] Kostoff, Ronald N et al. “Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19?.” Toxicology reports vol. 8 (2021): 1665-1684. doi:10.1016/j.toxrep.2021.08.010 [9] Ibid. [10] Shiravi, A.A., Ardekani, A., Sheikhbahaei, E. et al. Cardiovascular Complications of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines: An Overview. Cardiol Ther (2021). [11] Høeg, T. B., Krug, A., Stevenson, J., & Mandrola, J. (2021, January 1). SARS-COV-2 mrna vaccination-associated myocarditis in children ages 12-17: A stratified national database analysis. MedRxiv. Retrieved January 9, 2022, from [12] Jain, S. S., Steele, J. M., Fonseca, B., Huang, S., Shah, S., Maskatia, S. A., Buddhe, S., Misra, N., Ramachandran, P., Gaur, L., Eshtehardi, P., Anwar, S., Kaushik, N., Han, F., Chaudhuri, N. R., & Grosse-Wortmann, L. (2021, November 1). Covid-19 vaccination–associated myocarditis in adolescents. American Academy of Pediatrics. Retrieved January 9, 2022, from [13] Dionne A, Sperotto F, Chamberlain S, et al. Association of Myocarditis With BNT162b2 Messenger RNA COVID-19 Vaccine in a Case Series of Children. JAMA Cardiol. 2021;6(12):1446–1450. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2021.3471 [14] Chua, G. T., Kwan, M. Y. W., Chui, C. S. L., Smith, R. D., Cheung, E. C.-L., Tian, T., Leung, M. T. Y., Tsao, S. S. L., Kan, E., Ng, W. K. C., Man Chan, V. C., Tai, S. M., Yu, T. C., Lee, K. P., Wong, J. S. C., Lin, Y. K., Shek, C. C., Leung, A. S. Y., Chow, C. K., … Ip, P. (2021, November 28). Epidemiology of acute myocarditis/pericarditis in Hong Kong adolescents following Comirnaty vaccination. OUP Academic. Retrieved January 9, 2022, from [15] U.S. National Library of Medicine. (n.d.). Covid-19 vaccine children - search results - PubMed. National Center for Biotechnology Information. Retrieved January 9, 2022, from [16] Example 01: Viswanath K, Bekalu M, Dhawan D, Pinnamaneni R, Lang J, McLoud R. Individual and social determinants of COVID-19 vaccine uptake. BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 28;21(1):818. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10862-1. PMID: 33910558; PMCID: PMC8081000. [17] Example 02: Waring, Molly E et al. “Factors associated with mothers' hesitancy to receive a COVID-19 vaccine.” Journal of behavioral medicine, 1–6. 4 Jan. 2022, doi:10.1007/s10865-021-00268-0 [18] See: Finnegan, A. W. Tainted Immunity: Post-vaccinal encephalitis and the Chronic Plague of Societal Degeneration. The Garden of Great Work, published Sep 23, 2020, from: [19] Finnegan, A. W. Immune Tolerance and Slow-Virus Disease: Skeletons in the Closet of Western Science & Public Health. The Garden of Great Work, published January 11, 2020. From: [20] Bechter, K. (2013). Virus Infection as a Cause of Inflammation in Psychiatric Disorders. Modern Trends in Pharmacopsychiatry, 49–60. doi:10.1159/000343967 [21] Johnson, H. (2006). Osler's web: Inside the labyrinth of the chronic fatigue syndrome epidemic. iUniverse. [22] Reik, Jr. L. Immune-Mediated Central Nervous System Disorders in Childhood Viral Infections. Seminars in Neurology, Vol. 2. No. 2. June, 1982, pp. 106-114 [23] See: Finnegan, A. W. Tainted Immunity: Post-vaccinal encephalitis and the Chronic Plague of Societal Degeneration. The Garden of Great Work, published Sep 23, 2020, from: [24] Reliosis, B. (2016, January 13). M.e./cfs/fibromyalgia/lyme/ autism/gws: Post-sepsis syndrome. Retrieved February 17, 2021, from [25] Sepsis Alliance. (2021, February 05). Post-covid syndrome or post-sepsis syndrome? Retrieved February 18, 2021, from [26] Kostoff, Ronald N et al. “Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19?.” Toxicology reports vol. 8 (2021): 1665-1684. doi:10.1016/j.toxrep.2021.08.010 [27] Partnership to Fight Chronic Disease. (n.d.). The growing crisis of chronic disease in the United States. Retrieved January 10, 2022, from [28] Wells, K. (2021, October 26). ERS are now swamped with seriously ill patients - but many don't even have covid. NPR. Retrieved January 10, 2022, from [29] Finnegan, A. W. Neurotropic Viral Infections: The Darker Side of Immune Tolerance. Published on Academia, 2021, written in 2019. Available at: [30] Kaplan, S. (2021, February 12). As millions get Shots, F.D.A. struggles to get safety monitoring system running. Retrieved February 22, 2021, from [31] Introducing B together: B Together is Boston’s vaccine requirement for certain indoor spaces. Let’s stay healthy and connected — together. (2021, December 17). Retrieved January 10, 2022, from [32] Kostoff, Ronald N et al. “Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19?.” Toxicology reports vol. 8 (2021): 1665-1684. doi:10.1016/j.toxrep.2021.08.010 [33] Ibid. [34] Lei Y., Zhang J., Cr Schiavon, He M., Chen L., Shen H., Zhang Y., Yin Q., Cho Y., Andrade L., Gs Shadel, Hepokoski M., Lei T., Wang H., Zhang J., Jx Yuan, Malhotra A., Manor U., Wang S., Zy Yuan, Jy Shyy. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein impairs endothelial function via downregulation of ACE 2. Circ. Res. 2021;128(April (9)):1323–1326. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318902. [35] Nuovo G.J., Magro C., Shaffer T., Awad H., Suster D., Mikhail S., He B., Michaille J.J., Liechty B., Tili E. Endothelial cell damage is the central part of COVID-19 and a mouse model induced by injection of the S1 subunit of the spike protein. Ann. Diagn. Pathol. 2021;51:151682. [36] Suzuki Y.J., Gychka S.G. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein elicits cell signaling in human host cells: implications for possible consequences of COVID-19 vaccines. Vaccines. 2021;9:36. [37] Avolio E., Gamez M., Gupta K., Foster R., Berger I., Caputo M., Davidson A., Hill D., Madeddu P. 2020. The SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Disrupts the Cooperative Function of Human Cardiac Pericytes - Endothelial Cells Through CD147 Receptor-mediated Signalling: a Potential Non-infective Mechanism of COVID-19 Microvascular Disease. bioRxiv, 2020.12.21.423721. [38] Ibid.. [39] Asandei A., Mereuta L., Schiopu I., Park J., Seo C.H., Park Y. Non-receptor-mediated lipid membrane permeabilization by the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein S1 subunit. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2020;12(50):55649–55658. [40] Ndeupen S., Qin Z., Jacobsen S., Estanbouli H., Bouteau A., Igyártó B.Z. 2021. The mRNA-LNP Platform’s Lipid Nanoparticle Component Used in Preclinical Vaccine Studies Is Highly Inflammatory. bioRxiv. [41] Sellaturay P., Nasser S., Islam S., Gurugama P., Ewan P.W. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is a cause of anaphylaxis to the Pfizer/BioNTech mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. Clin. Exp. Allergy. 2021;51:861–863. [42] Igyártó B.Z., Jacobsen S., Ndeupen S. Future considerations for the mRNA-lipid nanoparticle vaccine platform. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2021;48:65–72. [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] [53] [54] Ibid. [55] Anderson EJ, Campbell JD, Creech CB, Frenck R, Kamidani S, Munoz FM, Nachman S, Spearman P. Warp Speed for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccines: Why Are Children Stuck in Neutral? Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Jul 15;73(2):336-340. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1425. PMID: 32945335; PMCID: PMC7543330. [56] Moore, John P, and P J Klasse. “COVID-19 Vaccines: "Warp Speed" Needs Mind Melds, Not Warped Minds.” Journal of virology vol. 94,17 e01083-20. 17 Aug. 2020, doi:10.1128/JVI.01083-20 [57] Bechter, K. (2013). Virus Infection as a Cause of Inflammation in Psychiatric Disorders. Modern Trends in Pharmacopsychiatry, 49–60. doi:10.1159/000343967 [58] Kostoff, Ronald N et al. “Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19?.” Toxicology reports vol. 8 (2021): 1665-1684. doi:10.1016/j.toxrep.2021.08.010 [59] Sahelian R. 2021. Covid Vaccine Side Effects. [Online]. Available: [60] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2021, November 17). Prion diseases. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved January 10, 2022, from [61] Classen, J Bart. COVID-19 RNA Based vaccines and the Risk of Prion Disease. Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. 18 January 2021. [62] Bizarre neurological illness plagues young Canadians. RT International. (n.d.). Retrieved January 10, 2022, from [63] Kostoff, Ronald N et al. “Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19?.” Toxicology reports vol. 8 (2021): 1665-1684. doi:10.1016/j.toxrep.2021.08.010 [64] WBUR. (2021, March 15). Reducing vaccine Hesitancy is worth more than $1 Billion, Biden administration says. Reducing Vaccine Hesitancy Is Worth More Than $1 Billion, Biden Administration Says: [65] Kostoff, Ronald N et al. “Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19?.” Toxicology reports vol. 8 (2021): 1665-1684. doi:10.1016/j.toxrep.2021.08.010 [66] Allassan, F. (2021, December 23). Trump to Candace Owens: "people aren't dying when they take the vaccine". Axios. Retrieved January 10, 2022, from [67] OpenVAERS. (n.d.). VAERS COVID Vaccine Adverse Event Reports. OpenVAERS. Retrieved January 9, 2022, from [68] Ungar, L. (n.d.). Why are so many vaccinated people getting COVID-19 lately? Retrieved January 10, 2022, from [69] Axe, D. (2022, January 5). The Next Big COVID Variant Could Be a Triple Whammy Nightmare. Retrieved January 10, 2022, from [70] Jaffe-Hoffman, M. (2021, December 25). ‘Israel could be completely unprotected against COVID-19 in a month’ - report. 'Israel could be completely unprotected against covid-19 in a month' - Report. Retrieved January 10, 2022, from [71] Hopkins, J. S. (2021, December 17). Pfizer delays plans to seek authorization of covid-19 vaccine for young children. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved January 10, 2022, from [72] Segev, D. (2021, March 15). Covid Vax in the immunosuppressed: Reason for concern. Medical News. Retrieved January 10, 2022, from [73] Kostoff, Ronald N et al. “Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19?.” Toxicology reports vol. 8 (2021): 1665-1684. doi:10.1016/j.toxrep.2021.08.010 [74] Kaplan, S. (2021, February 12). As millions get Shots, F.D.A. struggles to get safety monitoring system running. Retrieved February 22, 2021, from [75] OpenVAERS. (n.d.). VAERS COVID Vaccine Adverse Event Reports. OpenVAERS. Retrieved January 9, 2022, from [76] Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security. (2021, December 16). The SPARS Pandemic 2025 - 2028: A Futuristic Scenario for Public Health Risk Communicators. Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security. Preface: Possible Future in 2025: The “Echo Chamber”, pp. 1, Retrieved January 12, 2022, from [77]Ibid., Chapter 17: Vaccine Injury, pp. 59-61 [78] Ibid., Chapter 18: Acknowledging Loss, pp. 63-65 [79]Ibid., Chapter 18: Acknowledging Loss, pp. 65 [80] Kostoff, Ronald N et al. “Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19?.” Toxicology reports vol. 8 (2021): 1665-1684. doi:10.1016/j.toxrep.2021.08.010 [81] See: Finnegan, A. W. Tainted Immunity: Post-vaccinal encephalitis and the Chronic Plague of Societal Degeneration. The Garden of Great Work, published Sep 23, 2020, from: [82] Wakefield, A., Murch, S., Anthony, A., Linnell, J., Casson, D., Malik, M., … Walker-Smith, J. (1998). RETRACTED: Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children. The Lancet, 351(9103), 637–641. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(97)11096-0 [83] Finnegan, A. W. Tainted Immunity: Post-vaccinal encephalitis and the Chronic Plague of Societal Degeneration. The Garden of Great Work, published Sep 23, 2020, from: [84] Reik, Jr. L. Immune-Mediated Central Nervous System Disorders in Childhood Viral Infections. Seminars in Neurology, Vol. 2. No. 2. June, 1982, pp. 106-114 [85] Shah, Keerti, and Neal Nathanson. “Human Exposure To SV40: Review And Comment.” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 103, no. 1, 1976, pp. 1–12., doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112197 Retrieved from, or: [86] The Play Project. (2020, April 9). Why is autism increasing so much? The Play Project. Retrieved January 10, 2022, from [87] Finnegan, A. W. Medical Misanthropology: A Tale of Vaccination, Mental Illness, & Clinical Psychiatry. The Garden of Great Work, published November 20, 2020, from: [88] Traub, E. Persistence of Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Virus in Immune Animals and Its Relation to Immunity. Journal of Experimental Medicine, 63(6), 847-861. doi:10.1084/jem.63.6.847. (1936). [89] Bechter, K. (2013). Virus Infection as a Cause of Inflammation in Psychiatric Disorders. Modern Trends in Pharmacopsychiatry, 49–60. doi:10.1159/000343967 [90] Valsamakis, A et al. “Altered virulence of vaccine strains of measles virus after prolonged replication in human tissue.” Journal of virology vol. 73,10 (1999): 8791-7. doi:10.1128/JVI.73.10.8791-8797.1999 [91] Finnegan, A. W. Medical Misanthropology: A Tale of Vaccination, Mental Illness, & Clinical Psychiatry. The Garden of Great Work, published November 20, 2020, from: [92] Reik, Jr. L. Immune-Mediated Central Nervous System Disorders in Childhood Viral Infections. Seminars in Neurology, Vol. 2. No. 2. June, 1982, pp. 106-114 [93] Ibid. [94] Bosch BJ, van der Zee R, de Haan CA, Rottier PJ. The coronavirus spike protein is a class I virus fusion protein: structural and functional characterization of the fusion core complex. J Virol. 2003 Aug;77(16):8801-11. doi: 10.1128/jvi.77.16.8801-8811.2003. PMID: 12885899; PMCID: PMC167208. [95] Zhang J, Xiao T, Cai Y, Lavine CL, Peng H, Zhu H, Anand K, Tong P, Gautam A, Mayer ML, Walsh RM, Rits-Volloch S, Wesemann DR, Yang W, Seaman MS, Lu J, Chen B. Membrane fusion and immune evasion by the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant. bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2021 Aug 17:2021.08.17.456689. doi: 10.1101/2021.08.17.456689. Update in: Science. 2021 Oct 26;:eabl9463. PMID: 34426810; PMCID: PMC8382121. [96] Pfeil J, Simonetti M, Lauer U, Volkmer R, von Thülen B, Durek P, Krähmer R, Leenders F, Hamann A, Hoffmann U. Tolerogenic Immunomodulation by PEGylated Antigenic Peptides. Front Immunol. 2020 Oct 9;11:529035. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.529035. PMID: 33162973; PMCID: PMC7581722. [97] Valsamakis, A et al. “Altered virulence of vaccine strains of measles virus after prolonged replication in human tissue.” Journal of virology vol. 73,10 (1999): 8791-7. doi:10.1128/JVI.73.10.8791-8797.1999 [98] Kostoff, Ronald N et al. “Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19?.” Toxicology reports vol. 8 (2021): 1665-1684. doi:10.1016/j.toxrep.2021.08.010 [99] Opel DJ, Diekema DS, Ross LF. Should We Mandate a COVID-19 Vaccine for Children? JAMA Pediatr. 2021 Feb 1;175(2):125-126. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.3019. PMID: 32926083. [100] PubMed. (n.d.). "Covid-19 vaccine mandatory in children" - search results - pubmed [online]. National Center for Biotechnology Information. Retrieved January 10, 2022, from [101] Kostoff, Ronald N et al. “Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19?.” Toxicology reports vol. 8 (2021): 1665-1684. doi:10.1016/j.toxrep.2021.08.010 [102] Finnegan, A. W. Tainted Immunity: Post-vaccinal encephalitis and the Chronic Plague of Societal Degeneration. The Garden of Great Work, published Sep 23, 2020, from: [103] Finnegan, A. W. Neurotropic Viral Infections: The Darker Side of Immune Tolerance. Published on Academia, 2021, written in 2019. Available at: [104] Finnegan, A. W. VAERS and Vaccine Failure: A Public Health Treason & Complicity in Crimes Against Humanity. The Garden of Great Work, published March 13, 2021, from: [105] Finnegan, A. W. The Constant Plague of COVID-19 Vaccine Adverse Events: Immunosuppression & the Slow-Virus Disease. The Garden of Great Work, published December 03, 2021, from:

69 views0 comments